The Legal Examiner Affiliate Network The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner search instagram avvo phone envelope checkmark mail-reply spinner error close The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner The Legal Examiner
Skip to main content

Tragedy struck the Darien Lake Theme Park and Resort near Buffalo New York just last month when a 29 year old man fell to his death in a horrific fall from a 200-plus foot roller coaster. News stories focused on the fact that Sgt. James Hackemer was an Iraq war veteran that successfully survived a roadside bomb attack in 2008 leaving him with catastrophic injuries. In kind, the story garnered both local and national attention and has engendered the battle between advocates for uniform federal oversight of fixed-site amusements and industry insiders wishing to retain the status quo. It should be shocking to many that the Consumer Product Safety Commission (“CPSC”) has no oversight over fixed-site amusements, but it is true. The 1981 amendments to the definition of consumer products, passed in an era of budget cutting and de-regulation, specifically exclude amusements that are permanently fixed to a site. 15 U.S.C. § 2052(a)(5). Notwithstanding the traveling amusement rides and carnivals, the roller coasters and rides that you and your family enjoy do not have any consistency as to regulation and safety requirements. Thus, depending on which state you travel to, the roller coaster you choose to ride may not be subject to any regulation at all. Even more disturbing is the fact that a ride that has fatally injured one or more can be dismantled, re-branded and sold or sent to a sister amusement park in a state with little or no regulation.

The CPSC currently serves as a clearing house regarding a listing of ride malfunctions and safety information for traveling amusements and could similarly serve the same function for fixed-site amusements. The benefits of federal oversight would not stop there, but would include the product recall function that would be the only link between states to preempt the continued operation of an identical ride in another state. Nevertheless, the debate should continue and whether you fall on the side of federal oversight and consistency among states as to safety regulations, or continued deregulation of the fixed-site amusement industry, one common ground is present, each state must presently take action to promulgate amusement ride safety protocols that should include, among other things, increased ride inspections, better operator training and certification, and increased penalties for non-compliance. In the end, it is the safety of you and your family on the line.

Comments for this article are closed.